A10-9700E vs Core i5-4570T

A10-9700E vs Core i5-4570T Performance Spectrum

A10-9700E

4 / 4

3,250

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4570T

2 / 4

3,223

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9700E vs Core i5-4570T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9700E vs Core i5-4570T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9700E

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (600 vs 960).

Core i5-4570T

2013

Why buy it

✅+60% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,223 vs 3,250).
❌Launch MSRP is still $195 MSRP, while A10-9700E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-9700E better than Core i5-4570T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-4570T is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A10-9700E pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-9700E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-9700E is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-9700E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $195 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. Core i5-4570T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (16.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-9700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-9700E vs Core i5-4570T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-9700E

The A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-4570T

The Core i5-4570T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,223 points. Launch price was $222.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-9700E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4570T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9700E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-9700E versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-4570T — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-4570T (base: 3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-9700E uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4570T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700E scores 3,250 against the Core i5-4570T's 3,223 — a 0.8% lead for the A10-9700E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 600 vs 960, a 46.2% lead for the Core i5-4570T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700E vs 4096 kB (total) on the Core i5-4570T.

Feature	A10-9700E	Core i5-4570T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3 GHz+3%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4096 kB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,250	3,223
Geekbench 6 Single	600	960+60%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,719

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-9700E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4570T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A10-9700E versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4570T — the A10-9700E supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-9700E supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9700E) vs 16 (Core i5-4570T) — the Core i5-4570T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A10-9700E) and Intel 8 Series,Intel 9 Series (Core i5-4570T).

Feature	A10-9700E	Core i5-4570T
Socket	AM4	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+50%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9700E) vs Yes (Core i5-4570T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-9700E) and HD 4600 (Core i5-4570T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700E targets Low Power, Core i5-4570T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-9700E rivals Pentium G4560T.