Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E vs Radeon R7 A8-8650

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025Core: 1660 MHzBoost: 2920 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-8650

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E vs Radeon R7 A8-8650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

2025

Why buy it

  • 150.8% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 183.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $139 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 900% higher power demand at 300W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A8-8650

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $90 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
  • Delivers 121.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 300W, a 270W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 150.8% in average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 28.1% in PassMark G3D (921 vs 719), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A8-8650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $90 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $139, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 121.5% (14.7 vs 6.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A8-8650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-8650

The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 719 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E scores 921 versus the Radeon R7 A8-8650's 719 — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E leads by 28.1%. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is built on Bristol Ridge while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 uses GCN 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 825 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700ERadeon R7 A8-8650
G3D Mark Score
921+28%
719
Architecture
Bristol Ridge
GCN 1.0
Process Node
4 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4096+967%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
47.84 TFLOPS+7451%
0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2920 MHz+254%
825 MHz
ROPs
128+1500%
8
TMUs
256+967%
24
L2 Cache
8 MB+3100%
0.25 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700ERadeon R7 A8-8650
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-8650. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700ERadeon R7 A8-8650
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+3100%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E draws 300W versus the Radeon R7 A8-8650's 30W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700ERadeon R7 A8-8650
TDP
300W
30W-90%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
72
Perf/Watt
3.1
24.0+674%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E came in at $139, while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-8650 was 64.7% cheaper ($90 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 14.7 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers 122.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R7 PRO A10-9700ERadeon R7 A8-8650
MSRP
$139
$49-65%
Performance per Dollar
6.6
14.7+123%
Codename
Navi 48
Opal
Release
July 23 2025
January 9 2014
Ranking
#23
#890

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.