
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E

Radeon R7 A8-8650
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E vs Radeon R7 A8-8650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
2025Why buy it
- ✅150.8% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌183.7% HIGHER MSRP$139 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 14.7 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ❌900% higher power demand at 300W vs 30W.
Radeon R7 A8-8650
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 121.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.7 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 300W, a 270W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E vs Radeon R7 A8-8650 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.

Radeon R7 A8-8650
The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 719 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E scores 921 versus the Radeon R7 A8-8650's 719 — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E leads by 28.1%. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is built on Bristol Ridge while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 uses GCN 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 921+28% | 719 |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+967% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS+7451% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+254% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+1500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 256+967% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+3100% | 0.25 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-8650. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+3100% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E draws 300W versus the Radeon R7 A8-8650's 30W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon R7 A8-8650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-8650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 30W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1 | 24.0+674% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E came in at $139, while the Radeon R7 A8-8650 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-8650 was 64.7% cheaper ($90 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) vs 14.7 (Radeon R7 A8-8650) — the Radeon R7 A8-8650 offers 122.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E | Radeon R7 A8-8650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139 | $49-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.6 | 14.7+123% |
| Codename | Navi 48 | Opal |
| Release | July 23 2025 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #23 | #890 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















