
A10G
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅+14.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌904% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 130W.
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 778.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 150W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 13,598).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
A10G
2021GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+14.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 778.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 150W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 235mm instead of 267mm, a 32mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌904% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 130W.
- ❌13.6% longer card at 267mm vs 235mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,892 vs 13,598).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is A10G better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than A10G?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the A10G scores 13,598 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the A10G leads by 14.3%. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 288 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598+14% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+260% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+251% | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1755 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 288+260% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+260% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+260% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+260% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+200% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 14.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 235mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 75°C.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 130W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 235mm |
| Height | 112mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 90% less ($2251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 785.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $249-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 47.8+785% |
| Codename | GA102 | GA106 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #182 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













