A4-3310MX vs Core i5-13400F

CPU

GPU

A4-3310MX

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

A4-3310MX vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum

A4-3310MX

2 / 2

1,190

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-13400F

10 / 16

25,029

+2003.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3310MX vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3310MX vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3310MX

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6480G, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,190 vs 25,029).
❌Older platform position on FS1, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +598.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FS1 and older memory support.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A4-3310MX.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while A4-3310MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-3310MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than A4-3310MX?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 598.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2003.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 598.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 2003.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 598.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2011), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FS1, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

A4-3310MX vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3310MX

The A4-3310MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-3310MX packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3310MX versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 59.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A4-3310MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3310MX scores 1,190 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 181.8% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 273 vs 2,407, a 159.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3310MX vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	4.6 GHz+84%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.5 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	0 kB	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+25%
Process	32 nm	Intel 7 nm-78%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	1,190	25,029+2003%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	273	2,407+782%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,408

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3310MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A4-3310MX versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-3310MX) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Core i5-13400F
Socket	FS1	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+260%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	192 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-3310MX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The A4-3310MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6480G), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3310MX targets Budget Laptop, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: A4-3310MX rivals Pentium B960; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.