
A4-3310MX

Ryzen 5 5600
A4-3310MX vs Ryzen 5 5600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4-3310MX vs Ryzen 5 5600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4-3310MX vs Ryzen 5 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4-3310MX
2011Why buy it
- β Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6480G, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,190 vs 21,550).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +621.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike A4-3310MX.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while A4-3310MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while A4-3310MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than A4-3310MX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-3310MX vs Ryzen 5 5600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3310MX
The A4-3310MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011β2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $50.


Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The A4-3310MX packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Ryzen 5 5600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3310MX versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 β a 55.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The A4-3310MX uses the Llano (2011β2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020β2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3310MX scores 1,190 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 β a 179.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 273 vs 2,052, a 153% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3310MX vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | A4-3310MX | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.4 GHz+76% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Llano (2011β2012) | Vermeer (2020β2025) |
| PassMark | 1,190 | 21,550+1711% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 273 | 2,052+652% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The A4-3310MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A4-3310MX versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 β the Ryzen 5 5600 supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-3310MX) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) β the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A4-3310MX | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FS1 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-3200+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A4-3310MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6480G), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3310MX targets Budget Laptop, Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-3310MX rivals Pentium B960.
| Feature | A4-3310MX | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6480G | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













