A6-5200 vs Core 2 Duo T5500

A6-5200 vs Core 2 Duo T5500 Performance Spectrum

A6-5200

4 / 4

1,672

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T5500

2 / 2

1,660

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5200 vs Core 2 Duo T5500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5200 vs Core 2 Duo T5500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5200

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8400, while Core 2 Duo T5500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1150% higher power demand at 25W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T5500

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 25W, a 23W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,660 vs 1,672).
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-5200 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-5200 better than Core 2 Duo T5500?

Yes. A6-5200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-5200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 15 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-5200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-5200 still makes the most sense overall. A6-5200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-5200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-5200 vs Core 2 Duo T5500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5200

The A6-5200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,672 points. Launch price was $70.

Core 2 Duo T5500

The Core 2 Duo T5500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,660 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-5200 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-5200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the A6-5200 versus 1.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5500 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the A6-5200. The A6-5200 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5500 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5200 scores 1,672 against the Core 2 Duo T5500's 1,660 — a 0.7% lead for the A6-5200. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A6-5200	Core 2 Duo T5500
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz+20%	1.66 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.66 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2 MB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kabini (2013−2014)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	1,672	1,660
Geekbench 6 Single	215	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5200 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-5200	Core 2 Duo T5500
Socket	FT3	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-5200) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T5500). The A6-5200 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8400), while the Core 2 Duo T5500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5200 targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-5200 rivals Pentium N3510.