
A8-7670K
Popular choices:

Pentium Gold 4417U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
A8-7670K
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $43 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.7 vs 20.1 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Pentium Gold 4417U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.
Pentium Gold 4417U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7670K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,240 vs 3,267).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7670K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-7670K.
A8-7670K
2015Pentium Gold 4417U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $43 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.7 vs 20.1 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7 Graphics, while Pentium Gold 4417U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-7670K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,240 vs 3,267).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A8-7670K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-7670K.
Quick Answers
So, is A8-7670K better than Pentium Gold 4417U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A8-7670K | Pentium Gold 4417U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A8-7670K | Pentium Gold 4417U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 29 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A8-7670K | Pentium Gold 4417U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A8-7670K | Pentium Gold 4417U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A8-7670K and Pentium Gold 4417U

A8-7670K
A8-7670K
The A8-7670K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,267 points. Launch price was $90.

Pentium Gold 4417U
Pentium Gold 4417U
The Pentium Gold 4417U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,240 points. Launch price was $161.
Processing Power
The A8-7670K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Gold 4417U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-7670K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A8-7670K versus 2.3 GHz on the Pentium Gold 4417U — a 51.6% clock advantage for the A8-7670K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The A8-7670K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium Gold 4417U uses Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A8-7670K scores 3,267 against the Pentium Gold 4417U's 3,240 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-7670K.
| Feature | A8-7670K | Pentium Gold 4417U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+70% | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+57% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+300% | 1 MB |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Kaby Lake Refresh (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,267 | 3,240 |
Memory & Platform
The A8-7670K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Gold 4417U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | A8-7670K | Pentium Gold 4417U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | BGA1356 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (A8-7670K) / not specified (Pentium Gold 4417U). The A8-7670K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7 Graphics), while the Pentium Gold 4417U requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-7670K rivals Core i3-4170.
| Feature | A8-7670K | Pentium Gold 4417U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The A8-7670K launched at $118 MSRP, while the Pentium Gold 4417U debuted at $161. On MSRP ($118 vs $161), the A8-7670K is $43 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A8-7670K delivers 27.7 pts/$ vs 20.1 pts/$ for the Pentium Gold 4417U — making the A8-7670K the 31.6% better value option.
| Feature | A8-7670K | Pentium Gold 4417U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $118-27% | $161 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.7+38% | 20.1 |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













