Arc B570 vs GeForce GTX 1650

CPU

GPU

Arc B570

2025Core: 2500 MHzBoost: 2500 MHz

Arc family

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

GTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc B570 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum

Arc B570

8 GB 150

14,060

+78.7%

7,869

0.0%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc B570 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc B570 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc B570

2025

Why buy it

✅127.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 21.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 249mm, a 20mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 52.8 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc B570 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 127.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 78.7% in PassMark G3D (14,060 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc B570 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc B570 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $70 more expensive on MSRP at $219 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 21.6% (64.2 vs 52.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc B570 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc B570

The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc B570 scores 14,060 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Arc B570 leads by 78.7%. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Arc B570	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	14,060+79%	7,869
Architecture	Xe2	Turing
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2304+157%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.52 TFLOPS+286%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2500 MHz+50%	1665 MHz
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	144+157%	56
L1 Cache	4.5 MB+411%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	18 MB+1700%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc B570 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Arc B570	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc B570 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. Arc B570 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 380 GB/s (Arc B570) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 196.9% advantage for the Arc B570. Memory bus width is 160-bit on the Arc B570 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc B570	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	380 GB/s+197%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	160-bit+25%	128-bit
L2 Cache	18 MB+1700%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Arc B570	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Arc B570	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	Intel Xe Media	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	Intel Xe Media	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 249mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Arc B570	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	600W	300W-50%
Power Connector	8-pin	None
Length	249mm	229mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	93.7	104.9+12%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc B570 came in at $219, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 32% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Arc B570 offers 21.6% better value. The newer card here is Arc B570 (2025 vs 2019).

Feature	Arc B570	GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP	$219	$149-32%
Performance per Dollar	64.2+22%	52.8
Codename	BMG-G21	TU117
Release	January 16 2025	April 23 2019
Ranking	#169	#323

Search Arc B570 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.