Athlon 240GE vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

AMD

Athlon 240GE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Athlon 240GE vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 240GE vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 240GE vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 240GE

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $33 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $108 MSRP).
  • Delivers 41.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.8 vs 42.9 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $108 MSRP).
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (4,561 vs 4,633).

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

2020

Why buy it

  • +1.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 240GE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.9 vs 60.8 PassMark/$ ($108 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 240GE.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE better than Athlon 240GE?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 240GE is ahead with a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is still the better call for a fresh build. Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE comes in 44.0% more expensive on MSRP at $108 MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.6% better PassMark. Athlon 240GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 4,561 PassMark with 2 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 240GE vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon 240GE

The Athlon 240GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,561 points. Launch price was $75.

AMD

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 4,633 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 240GE and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 240GE versus 3.4 GHz on the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE — a 2.9% clock advantage for the Athlon 240GE (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Athlon 240GE uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 240GE scores 4,561 against the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE's 4,633 — a 1.6% lead for the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon 240GEAthlon Silver PRO 3125GE
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+3%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+3%
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark
4,561
4,633+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
930
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,200
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Athlon 240GE versus DDR4-2667 on the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE — the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE supports 0% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 8 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A320,B450 (Athlon 240GE) and AMD AM4 (Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE).

FeatureAthlon 240GEAthlon Silver PRO 3125GE
Socket
AM4
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2667
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
8
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 240GE) / not specified (Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE). Both include integrated graphics Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon 240GE) and AMD Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 240GE targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 240GE rivals Pentium Gold G5400.

FeatureAthlon 240GEAthlon Silver PRO 3125GE
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 3
AMD Radeon Vega 3
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 240GE was priced at $75, while the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE came in at $108. On launch pricing ($75 vs $108), Athlon 240GE was $33 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 240GE delivers 60.8 pts/$ vs 42.9 pts/$ for the Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE — making the Athlon 240GE the 34.5% better value option.

FeatureAthlon 240GEAthlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP
$75-31%
$108
Performance per Dollar
60.8+42%
42.9
Release Date
2018
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.