
Athlon 240GE

Core i5-3450
Athlon 240GE vs Core i5-3450 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 240GE vs Core i5-3450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon 240GE vs Core i5-3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 240GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $109 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 147.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.8 vs 24.5 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 77W, a 42W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Core i5-3450.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
Core i5-3450
2012Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,517 vs 4,561).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.5 vs 60.8 PassMark/$ ($184 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
- ❌120% higher power demand at 77W vs 35W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 240GE.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 240GE better than Core i5-3450?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 240GE vs Core i5-3450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 240GE
The Athlon 240GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,561 points. Launch price was $75.

Core i5-3450
The Core i5-3450 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,517 points. Launch price was $186.
Processing Power
The Athlon 240GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3450 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-3450 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 240GE versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-3450 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Athlon 240GE uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-3450 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 240GE scores 4,561 against the Core i5-3450's 4,517 — a 1% lead for the Athlon 240GE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 240GE vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-3450.
| Feature | Athlon 240GE | Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+13% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 6144 kB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Zen (2017−2020) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,561 | 4,517 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 930 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,200 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 240GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3450 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Athlon 240GE versus 1600 on the Core i5-3450 — the Athlon 240GE supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 240GE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon 240GE) vs 16 (Core i5-3450) — the Core i5-3450 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Athlon 240GE | Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+67% | 1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 240GE) vs true (Core i5-3450). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon 240GE) and Intel HD Graphics 2500 (Core i5-3450) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 240GE targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 240GE rivals Pentium Gold G5400.
| Feature | Athlon 240GE | Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon 240GE was priced at $75, while the Core i5-3450 came in at $184. On launch pricing ($75 vs $184), Athlon 240GE was $109 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 240GE delivers 60.8 pts/$ vs 24.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-3450 — making the Athlon 240GE the 85% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 240GE | Core i5-3450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $75-59% | $184 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.8+148% | 24.5 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















