Athlon 240GE vs Xeon D-1518

Athlon 240GE vs Xeon D-1518 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 240GE

2 / 4

4,561

0.0%

FX-9800P

Athlon X4 830

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon D-1518

4 / 8

4,562

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 240GE vs Xeon D-1518 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 240GE vs Xeon D-1518: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 240GE

2018

Why buy it

✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon D-1518 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Xeon D-1518.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon D-1518 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,561 vs 4,562).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1518, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Xeon D-1518 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1518

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 4 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 240GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 240GE.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1518 better than Athlon 240GE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1518 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon 240GE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon D-1518 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1518 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1518 is still the better call for a fresh build. Xeon D-1518 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 240GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 4,561 PassMark with 2 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 240GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015) and 166.7% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1.5 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 240GE vs Xeon D-1518 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 240GE

The Athlon 240GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,561 points. Launch price was $75.

Xeon D-1518

The Xeon D-1518 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,562 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 240GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon D-1518 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon D-1518 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 240GE versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1518 — a 45.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 240GE (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Athlon 240GE uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-1518 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 240GE scores 4,561 against the Xeon D-1518's 4,562 — a 0% lead for the Xeon D-1518. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 240GE vs 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1518.

Feature	Athlon 240GE	Xeon D-1518
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+59%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+167%	1.5 MB (per core)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	4,561	4,562
Geekbench 6 Single	930	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,200	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 240GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1518 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 240GE	Xeon D-1518
Socket	AM4	FCBGA1667
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 240GE) / not specified (Xeon D-1518). The Athlon 240GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon D-1518 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 240GE targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 240GE rivals Pentium Gold G5400.