Athlon 240GE
VS
Core i7-2860QM

Athlon 240GE vs Core i7-2860QM

AMD

Athlon 240GE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core i7-2860QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 240GE

#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
108%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
108%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
108%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
108%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
107%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
107%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
107%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
106%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
106%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
105%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
104%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
104%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
104%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
103%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
100%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
100%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
94%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
94%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
93%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
90%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
88%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
86%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
83%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
83%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
80%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
79%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
78%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
73%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
69%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
68%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
67%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2860QM

#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
91%
#56
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
223%
#57
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
220%
#58
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
202%
#59
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
201%
#60
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
199%
#62
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
192%
#63
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
185%
#64
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
184%
#65
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
179%
#68
Core i7-2860QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
98%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
95%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon 240GE (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon 240GECore i7-2860QM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2860QM (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon 240GECore i7-2860QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 240GE and Core i7-2860QM

AMD

Athlon 240GE

The Athlon 240GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,561 points. Launch price was $75.

Intel

Core i7-2860QM

The Core i7-2860QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,597 points. Launch price was $568.

Processing Power

The Athlon 240GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2860QM offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-2860QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 240GE versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-2860QM — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-2860QM (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Athlon 240GE uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-2860QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 240GE scores 4,561 against the Core i7-2860QM's 4,597 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-2860QM. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 240GE vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2860QM.

FeatureAthlon 240GECore i7-2860QM
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz+3%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+40%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
4,561
4,597
Geekbench 6 Single
930
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 240GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2860QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Athlon 240GE versus 1600 on the Core i7-2860QM — the Core i7-2860QM supports 199% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 240GE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon 240GE) vs 16 (Core i7-2860QM) — the Core i7-2860QM offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B450 (Athlon 240GE) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2860QM).

FeatureAthlon 240GECore i7-2860QM
Socket
AM4
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
1600+39900%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+209715100%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon 240GE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 240GE) vs true (Core i7-2860QM). Both include integrated graphics Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon 240GE) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2860QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 240GE targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon 240GE rivals Pentium Gold G5400; Core i7-2860QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.

FeatureAthlon 240GECore i7-2860QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 3
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Budget Desktop