Athlon 240GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770

AMD

Athlon 240GE

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Core 2 Extreme QX9770

4 Cores4 Thrd136 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2008

Athlon 240GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 240GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 240GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 240GE

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…+106.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • βœ…Costs $1,324 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 1745.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 60.8 vs 3.3 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 136W, a 101W reduction.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Core 2 Extreme QX9770 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core 2 Extreme QX9770

2008

Why buy it

  • βœ…100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (451 vs 930).
  • ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,583 vs 2,200).
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 60.8 PassMark/$ ($1,399 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
  • ❌288.6% higher power demand at 136W vs 35W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon 240GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 240GE better than Core 2 Extreme QX9770?
Yes. Athlon 240GE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 39% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Athlon 240GE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 240GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 39% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon 240GE is the better buy right now. Athlon 240GE comes in $1,324 cheaper on MSRP at $75 MSRP versus $1,399 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1745.1% better value on MSRP (60.8 vs 3.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 240GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 240GE vs Core 2 Extreme QX9770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon 240GE

The Athlon 240GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017βˆ’2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,561 points. Launch price was $75.

Intel

Core 2 Extreme QX9770

The Core 2 Extreme QX9770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007βˆ’2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 12 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 136 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,611 points. Launch price was $249.

⚑

Processing Power

The Athlon 240GE packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads β€” the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Athlon 240GE versus 3.2 GHz on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 β€” a 9% clock advantage for the Athlon 240GE (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Athlon 240GE uses the Zen (2017βˆ’2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses Yorkfield (2007βˆ’2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 240GE scores 4,561 against the Core 2 Extreme QX9770's 4,611 β€” a 1.1% lead for the Core 2 Extreme QX9770. Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 930 vs 451, a 69.4% lead for the Athlon 240GE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,200 vs 1,583 (32.6% advantage for the Athlon 240GE). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 240GE vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770.

FeatureAthlon 240GECore 2 Extreme QX9770
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+9%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+9%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+4167%
12 MB (total)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017βˆ’2020)
Yorkfield (2007βˆ’2009)
PassMark
4,561
4,611+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
β€”
2,200
Geekbench 6 Single
930+106%
451
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,200+39%
1,583
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 240GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Athlon 240GE versus DDR3-1600 on the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 β€” the Athlon 240GE supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 240GE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β€” 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon 240GE) vs 16 (Core 2 Extreme QX9770) β€” the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B450 (Athlon 240GE) and X48,X38,P45 (Core 2 Extreme QX9770).

FeatureAthlon 240GECore 2 Extreme QX9770
Socket
AM4
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666+67%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+300%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 240GE) vs VT-x (Core 2 Extreme QX9770). The Athlon 240GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 240GE targets Budget Desktop, Core 2 Extreme QX9770 targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Athlon 240GE rivals Pentium Gold G5400.

FeatureAthlon 240GECore 2 Extreme QX9770
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 3
β€”
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Budget Desktop
Enthusiast
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 240GE was priced at $75, while the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 came in at $1399. On launch pricing ($75 vs $1399), Athlon 240GE was $1324 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 240GE delivers 60.8 pts/$ vs 3.3 pts/$ for the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 β€” making the Athlon 240GE the 179.4% better value option.

FeatureAthlon 240GECore 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP
$75-95%
$1399
Performance per Dollar
60.8+1742%
3.3
Release Date
2018
2008

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.