
Athlon 64 2800+ vs Core i7-13700K

Athlon 64 2800+

Core i7-13700K
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Athlon 64 2800+ is positioned at rank #1098 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2800+
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700K
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 2800+ | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($400) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (NewCastle (2004) / 130 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 2800+ | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+309%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($400) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 2800+ and Core i7-13700K

Athlon 64 2800+
The Athlon 64 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Abril 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 420 points. Launch price was $100.

Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 2800+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 15 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 2800+ versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 100% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K. The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2800+ scores 420 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 196.4% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 2800+ vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.
| Feature | Athlon 64 2800+ | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 16 / 24+1500% |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz+200% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 130 nm | Intel 7 nm-95% |
| Architecture | NewCastle (2004) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 420 | 45,784+10801% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 31,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,846 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,980 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 2800+ uses the 754 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i7-13700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 2800+ versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K — the Core i7-13700K supports -205.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon 64 2800+) vs 2 (Core i7-13700K). PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 2800+) vs 20 (Core i7-13700K) — the Core i7-13700K offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 754 (Athlon 64 2800+) and Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K).
| Feature | Athlon 64 2800+ | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 754 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 5.0+355% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 192 GB+4700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 2800+) / true (Core i7-13700K). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Athlon 64 2800+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Athlon 64 2800+ | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 2800+ launched at $178 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. At current prices ($15 vs $400), the Athlon 64 2800+ is $385 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 2800+ delivers 28.0 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core i7-13700K the 121.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 2800+ | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $178-56% | $409 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-96% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.0 | 114.5+309% |
| Release Date | 2004 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















