Athlon 64 3300+ vs Turion 64 MT-32

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Turion 64 MT-32 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 3300+

1 / 1

522

+3.4%

Athlon XP 2200+

Athlon XP 2600+

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

Athlon 64 3000+

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 MT-32

1 / 1

505

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Turion 64 MT-32 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Turion 64 MT-32: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 3300+

2004

Why buy it

✅Draws 89W instead of 512W, a 423W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Turion 64 MT-32.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Turion 64 MT-32 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 MT-32

2005

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 522).
❌475.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 89W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 3300+.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 3300+ better than Turion 64 MT-32?

Yes. Athlon 64 3300+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 3300+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 3300+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 3300+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 3300+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (2.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion 64 MT-32 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2005 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 3300+ vs Turion 64 MT-32 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 3300+

The Athlon 64 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 522 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion 64 MT-32

The Turion 64 MT-32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 3300+ and Turion 64 MT-32 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon 64 3300+ versus 1.79 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-32 — a 29.1% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 3300+. The Athlon 64 3300+ uses the NewCastle (2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-32 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 3300+ scores 522 against the Turion 64 MT-32's 505 — a 3.3% lead for the Athlon 64 3300+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 3300+	Turion 64 MT-32
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+34%	1.79 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	512 kB+100%
Process	130 nm	90 nm-31%
Architecture	NewCastle (2004)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	522+3%	505
Geekbench 6 Single	150	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	150	—