Athlon 64 FX-57
Opteron 254
Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Opteron 254 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Opteron 254 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Call of Duty: Warzone
Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Opteron 254: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon 64 FX-57
2005Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,031 MSRP, while Opteron 254 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Opteron 254
2005Why buy it
- ✅Draws 92W instead of 104W, a 12W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon 64 FX-57 across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (690 vs 720).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon 64 FX-57 better than Opteron 254?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Opteron 254 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon 64 FX-57
The Athlon 64 FX-57 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 104 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 720 points. Launch price was $149.
Opteron 254
The Opteron 254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Troy (2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 92 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 690 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon 64 FX-57 and Opteron 254 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-57 versus 2.8 GHz on the Opteron 254 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 FX-57 uses the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Opteron 254 uses Troy (2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-57 scores 720 against the Opteron 254's 690 — a 4.3% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-57. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-57 | Opteron 254 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Architecture | San Diego (2001−2005) | Troy (2005) |
| PassMark | 720+4% | 690 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 FX-57 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Opteron 254 uses 940 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 FX-57 | Opteron 254 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | 939 | 940 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 FX-57 and Opteron 254
