Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-60

2006

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,205 vs 22,430).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,031 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌69.2% higher power demand at 110W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +735.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $702 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,031 MSRP).
✅Delivers 5733.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 1.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,031 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 110W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 FX-60.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Athlon 64 FX-60?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 735.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1761.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 735.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1761.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in $702 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $1,031 MSRP, and it still gives you a 735.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 5733.2% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 1.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 FX-60

The Athlon 64 FX-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toledo (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,205 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 FX-60 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-60 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 51.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X. The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the Toledo (2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-60 scores 1,205 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 179.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-60 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-60	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	8 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	4.4 GHz+69%
Base Clock	—	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	32 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	90 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-92%
Architecture	Toledo (2006)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	1,205	22,430+1761%
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	480	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 FX-60 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports -900% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 FX-60) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce4,K8T890 (Athlon 64 FX-60) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-60	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	939	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 4.0+264%
Max RAM Speed	DDR-400	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	128 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Athlon 64 FX-60) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-60 targets Gaming/Enthusiast.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-60	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	None	—
Target Use	Gaming/Enthusiast	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 FX-60 was priced at $1031, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($1031 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $702 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-60 delivers 1.2 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 193.3% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-60	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$1031	$329-68%
Performance per Dollar	1.2	68.2+5583%
Release Date	2006	2019

Search Athlon 64 FX-60 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.