Athlon 64 FX-60
VS
Ryzen 9 5900X

Athlon 64 FX-60 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-60

2 Cores2 Thrd110 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2006
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 5900X

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Athlon 64 FX-60 is positioned at rank #1119 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-60

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
266423%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
251744%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
182786%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
55066%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
43618%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
38157%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
21855%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
21569%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
19639%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
19638%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
19418%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
18894%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
18630%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
18555%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
18386%
#1118
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
100%
#1119
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
100%
#1120
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
99%
#1121
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
96%
#1122
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
94%
#1123
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
88%
#1124
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
86%
#1125
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
84%
#1126
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
82%
#1127
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
78%
#1128
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
78%
#1129
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
78%
#1130
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
76%
#1131
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
75%
#1132
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
72%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 5900X

#141
Core i9-13900K
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
105%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
104%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
103%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
103%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
103%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
103%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
102%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
102%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
102%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
101%
#151
Core Ultra 7 265T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $362
101%
#152
Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $85|Avg: $64
101%
#153
Core i3-9100T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
101%
#154
Ryzen 5 4600G
MSRP: $154|Avg: $143
100%
#155
Core i7-13700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
100%
#156
Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $350
100%
#157
Core i7-13700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $345
100%
#158
Core i5-13600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
99%
#159
Ryzen 5 3400GE
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
99%
#160
Core i7-12700F
MSRP: $314|Avg: $275
99%
#161
Core i5-9400
MSRP: $192|Avg: $85
99%
#162
Core i3-13100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $128
99%
#163
Core i9-10910
MSRP: $488|Avg: $200
96%
#164
Core i5-14600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
96%
#165
Core i5-11500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
95%
#166
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#167
Ryzen 3 8300GE
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
95%
#168
Core i3-13100T
MSRP: $134|Avg: $122
94%
#169
Core i5-10600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $110
94%
#170
Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $100|Avg: $67
94%
#171
Core Ultra 9 285
MSRP: $589|Avg: $550
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 9 5900X (2020) utilizes 7 nm, 12 nm technology and DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon 64 FX-60Ryzen 9 5900X
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,000)
More affordable ($350)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Toledo (2006) / 90 nm)
✨ Modern (Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon 64 FX-60 (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon 64 FX-60Ryzen 9 5900X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+9137%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,000)
More affordable ($350)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-60 and Ryzen 9 5900X

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-60

The Athlon 64 FX-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toledo (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,205 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 FX-60 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-60 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 59.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X. The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the Toledo (2006) architecture (90 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-60 scores 1,205 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 188% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 2,174, a 158.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 480 vs 11,888 (184.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-60 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-60Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
12 / 24+500%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
4.8 GHz+85%
Base Clock
3.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
64 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512K (per core)
Process
90 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-92%
Architecture
Toledo (2006)
Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark
1,205
38,955+3133%
Cinebench R23 Multi
21,000
Geekbench 6 Single
250
2,174+770%
Geekbench 6 Multi
480
11,888+2377%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-60 uses the 939 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 FX-60 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports -204% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 FX-60) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce4,K8T890 (Athlon 64 FX-60) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-60Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket
939
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 4.0+264%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-400
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
128 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Athlon 64 FX-60) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-60 targets Gaming/Enthusiast, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-60Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
None
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming/Enthusiast
Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon 64 FX-60 launched at $1031 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900X debuted at $549. At current prices ($1000 vs $350), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $650 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-60 delivers 1.2 pts/$ vs 111.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 195.7% better value option.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-60Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP
$1031
$549-47%
Avg Price (30d)
$1000
$350-65%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
111.3+9175%
Release Date
2006
2020