CPU
GPU
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
A10-7300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is positioned at rank 1037 and the A10-7300 is on rank 1042, so the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Performance Per Dollar A10-7300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | A10-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Brisbane (2007−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | A10-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+151%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and A10-7300
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,745 points. Launch price was $149.
A10-7300
The A10-7300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,736 points. Launch price was $130.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A10-7300 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7300 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus 3.2 GHz on the A10-7300 — a 6.5% clock advantage for the A10-7300. The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the A10-7300 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ scores 1,745 against the A10-7300's 1,736 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5800+.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | A10-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 4096 kB+700% |
| Process | 65 nm | 28 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Brisbane (2007−2008) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,745 | 1,736 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10-7300 uses FP3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ versus DDR3-1600 on the A10-7300 — the A10-7300 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) vs 16 (A10-7300) — the A10-7300 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) and FP3 (A10-7300).
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | A10-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | FP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-1600+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5800+) / AMD-V (A10-7300). The A10-7300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7300 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-7300 rivals Core i3-4010U.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | A10-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon R6 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 X2 5800+ launched at $230 MSRP, while the A10-7300 debuted at $150. At current prices ($20 vs $50), the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ delivers 87.3 pts/$ vs 34.7 pts/$ for the A10-7300 — making the Athlon 64 X2 5800+ the 86.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 5800+ | A10-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $230 | $150-35% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-60% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.3+152% | 34.7 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and A10-7300
