Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2667

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2667 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

4 / 4

7,468

+0.3%

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2667

6 / 12

7,442

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2667 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2667: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $1,402 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 938.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.8 vs 4.8 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Xeon E5-2667 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2667 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2667, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2667

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 8.
✅400% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,442 vs 7,468).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 49.8 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Gold PRO 3150G better than Xeon E5-2667?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2667 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is the better buy right now. Athlon Gold PRO 3150G comes in $1,402 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $1,552 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2667 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 17.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 938.3% better value on MSRP (49.8 vs 4.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Xeon E5-2667 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Gold PRO 3150G

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,468 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2667

The Xeon E5-2667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,442 points. Launch price was $714.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G scores 7,468 against the Xeon E5-2667's 7,442 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2667
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+11%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+21%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	15360 kB (total)+275%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-63%	32 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	7,468	7,442

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G versus DDR3 1600 MHz on the Xeon E5-2667 — the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G supports 83.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2667 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2667). PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2667) — the Xeon E5-2667 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM4 (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) and Intel C602,Intel X79 (Xeon E5-2667).

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2667
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2933+83%	DDR3 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	384 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	8	40+400%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon Gold PRO 3150G) / true (Xeon E5-2667). The Athlon Gold PRO 3150G includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Xeon E5-2667 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2667 targets Server.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2667
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Vega 3	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	true
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was priced at $150, while the Xeon E5-2667 came in at $1552. On launch pricing ($150 vs $1552), Athlon Gold PRO 3150G was $1402 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 4.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2667 — making the Athlon Gold PRO 3150G the 164.9% better value option.

Feature	Athlon Gold PRO 3150G	Xeon E5-2667
MSRP	$150-90%	$1552
Performance per Dollar	49.8+938%	4.8
Release Date	2020	2012

Search Athlon Gold PRO 3150G on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2667 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.