Athlon II N370
VS
Celeron G550T

Athlon II N370 vs Celeron G550T

AMD

Athlon II N370

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Celeron G550T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II N370 is positioned at rank 923 and the Celeron G550T is on rank 673, so the Celeron G550T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II N370

#911
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1623%
#912
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1599%
#913
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1468%
#914
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1461%
#915
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1448%
#917
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1398%
#918
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1341%
#919
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1338%
#920
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1303%
#923
Athlon II N370
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#928
A8-6410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
98%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G550T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12191%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11519%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8364%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2520%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1996%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1746%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1000%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
987%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
899%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
899%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
889%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
865%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
852%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
849%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
841%
#672
Core i5-4430
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
100%
#673
Celeron G550T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
100%
#674
Pentium G2130
MSRP: $75|Avg: $8
100%
#676
Core i5-4460S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $50
100%
#677
Core i7-6700K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $142
100%
#679
Pentium G3420T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $40
100%
#680
Core i5-3570
MSRP: $194|Avg: $35
99%
#681
Pentium G3450T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $45
99%
#682
Celeron E3200
MSRP: $43|Avg: $5
99%
#683
Core i5-3470
MSRP: $184|Avg: $55
99%
#684
Core i5-3450S
MSRP: $174|Avg: $20
99%
#685
Core i7-5820K
MSRP: $389|Avg: $103
99%
#686
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G550T leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon II N370 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon II N370Celeron G550T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Champlain (2010−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron G550T stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 50% cheaper ($5 vs $10) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightAthlon II N370Celeron G550T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+98%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II N370 and Celeron G550T

AMD

Athlon II N370

The Athlon II N370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,085 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron G550T

The Celeron G550T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,074 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II N370 and Celeron G550T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II N370 versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G550T — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II N370. The Athlon II N370 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G550T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II N370 scores 1,085 against the Celeron G550T's 1,074 — a 1% lead for the Athlon II N370. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 220 vs 366, a 49.8% lead for the Celeron G550T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 420 vs 656 (43.9% advantage for the Celeron G550T).

FeatureAthlon II N370Celeron G550T
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+14%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Champlain (2010−2011)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,085+1%
1,074
Geekbench 6 Single
220
366+66%
Geekbench 6 Multi
420
656+56%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II N370 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G550T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G550T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II N370) vs 16 (Celeron G550T) — the Celeron G550T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: RS880M,SB850 (Athlon II N370) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G550T).

FeatureAthlon II N370Celeron G550T
Socket
S1
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II N370) vs VT-x (Celeron G550T). The Celeron G550T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon II N370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II N370 targets Legacy Laptop, Celeron G550T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II N370 rivals Pentium P6100; Celeron G550T rivals Pentium G630T.

FeatureAthlon II N370Celeron G550T
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon II N370 launched at $60 MSRP, while the Celeron G550T debuted at $42. At current prices ($10 vs $5), the Celeron G550T is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II N370 delivers 108.5 pts/$ vs 214.8 pts/$ for the Celeron G550T — making the Celeron G550T the 65.8% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II N370Celeron G550T
MSRP
$60
$42-30%
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$5-50%
Performance per Dollar
108.5
214.8+98%
Release Date
2010
2011