Athlon II P320
VS
Athlon 5350

Athlon II P320 vs Athlon 5350

AMD

Athlon II P320

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Athlon 5350

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.05 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II P320 is positioned at rank 622 and the Athlon 5350 is on rank 564, so the Athlon 5350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II P320

#610
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
826%
#611
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
814%
#612
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
747%
#613
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
744%
#614
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
737%
#616
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
712%
#617
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
682%
#618
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
681%
#619
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
663%
#622
Athlon II P320
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#625
Core 3 N355
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#628
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 5350

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9547%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9021%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6550%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1973%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1563%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1367%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
783%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
773%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
704%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
704%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
696%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
677%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
668%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
665%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
659%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
100%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
99%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
99%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
98%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
98%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
98%
#572
Pentium G4500T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
98%
#573
Core i5-7500
MSRP: $199|Avg: $65
98%
#574
Core i7-7700
MSRP: $272|Avg: $102
97%
#575
Celeron G1610T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
97%
#576
Athlon X4 750K
MSRP: $91|Avg: $17
97%
#577
Core i7-7700K
MSRP: $305|Avg: $140
97%
#578
Core i5-7600K
MSRP: $217|Avg: $84
96%
#579
FX-6300
MSRP: $132|Avg: $35
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 5350 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon II P320 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon II P320Athlon 5350
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Champlain (2010−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon 5350 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($15 vs $15) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightAthlon II P320Athlon 5350
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II P320 and Athlon 5350

AMD

Athlon II P320

The Athlon II P320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,776 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Athlon 5350

The Athlon 5350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.05 GHz, with boost up to 2.05 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,796 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Athlon II P320 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon 5350 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon 5350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Athlon II P320 versus 2.05 GHz on the Athlon 5350 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II P320. The Athlon II P320 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon 5350 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II P320 scores 1,776 against the Athlon 5350's 1,796 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon 5350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 189 vs 223, a 16.5% lead for the Athlon 5350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 308 vs 708 (78.7% advantage for the Athlon 5350).

FeatureAthlon II P320Athlon 5350
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz+2%
2.05 GHz
Base Clock
2.05 GHz
L2 Cache
1 MB
2048 kB+100%
Process
45 nm
28 nm-38%
Architecture
Champlain (2010−2011)
Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,776
1,796+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
189
223+18%
Geekbench 6 Multi
308
708+130%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II P320 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 5350 uses AM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II P320 versus 1600 on the Athlon 5350 — the Athlon 5350 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 5350 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon II P320) vs 1 (Athlon 5350). PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II P320) vs 8 (Athlon 5350) — the Athlon 5350 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: M880G (Athlon II P320) and AM1 (Athlon 5350).

FeatureAthlon II P320Athlon 5350
Socket
S1g4
AM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
1600+53233%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+52428700%
16
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II P320) vs true (Athlon 5350). The Athlon 5350 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3 Graphics), while the Athlon II P320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II P320 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II P320 rivals Pentium P6000; Athlon 5350 rivals Pentium J2900.

FeatureAthlon II P320Athlon 5350
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Radeon R3 Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon II P320 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Athlon 5350 debuted at $55. At current prices ($15 vs $15), the Athlon 5350 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II P320 delivers 118.4 pts/$ vs 119.7 pts/$ for the Athlon 5350 — making the Athlon 5350 the 1.1% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II P320Athlon 5350
MSRP
$50-9%
$55
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$15
Performance per Dollar
118.4
119.7+1%
Release Date
2010
2014