
Athlon MP 2400+

Ryzen 9 5900X
Athlon MP 2400+ vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon MP 2400+ vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon MP 2400+ vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon MP 2400+
2002Why buy it
- ✅Costs $398 less on MSRP ($151 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 105W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (305 vs 38,955).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($151 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3329.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 3412.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 2.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $151 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌263.6% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$151 MSRP
- ❌75% higher power demand at 105W vs 60W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Athlon MP 2400+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon MP 2400+ vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon MP 2400+
The Athlon MP 2400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 December 2002 (22 years ago). It is based on the K7 (2000−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $228.


Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Athlon MP 2400+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 11 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon MP 2400+ versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 82.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X. The Athlon MP 2400+ uses the K7 (2000−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon MP 2400+ scores 305 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 196.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Athlon MP 2400+ | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 12 / 24+1100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 4.8 GHz+140% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 130 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-95% |
| Architecture | K7 (2000−2004) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 305 | 38,955+12672% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-266 on the Athlon MP 2400+ versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports -1303% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon MP 2400+) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X). PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon MP 2400+) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon MP 2400+) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | Athlon MP 2400+ | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 4.0+264% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-266 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon MP 2400+) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Athlon MP 2400+ | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon MP 2400+ was priced at $151, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($151 vs $549), Athlon MP 2400+ was $398 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon MP 2400+ delivers 2.0 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 188.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon MP 2400+ | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $151-72% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 71.0+3450% |
| Release Date | 2002 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














