Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Sempron 150

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Sempron 150 Performance Spectrum

Athlon Neo X2 L325

2 / 2

615

+6.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Sempron 150

1 / 1

579

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Sempron 150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Sempron 150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon Neo X2 L325

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Sempron 150 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron 150

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon Neo X2 L325 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (579 vs 615).
❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon Neo X2 L325 better than Sempron 150?

Yes. Athlon Neo X2 L325 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 6.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon Neo X2 L325 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.1% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon Neo X2 L325 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon Neo X2 L325 is the better buy right now. Athlon Neo X2 L325 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron 150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Sempron 150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Neo X2 L325

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Congo (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: ASB1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $149.

Sempron 150

The Sempron 150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 December 2010 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 579 points. Launch price was $73.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Sempron 150 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon Neo X2 L325 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Athlon Neo X2 L325 versus 2.9 GHz on the Sempron 150 — a 63.6% clock advantage for the Sempron 150. The Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses the Congo (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 150 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Neo X2 L325 scores 615 against the Sempron 150's 579 — a 6% lead for the Athlon Neo X2 L325.

Feature	Athlon Neo X2 L325	Sempron 150
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+93%
Base Clock	—	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB (per core)
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Congo (2009)	Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark	615+6%	579

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 uses the ASB1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 150 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.