
Athlon Silver 3050e

Core i5-10400F
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon Silver 3050e
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,175 vs 8,191).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.8 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +181.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Delivers 173.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 29.8 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon Silver 3050e.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$160 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Athlon Silver 3050e can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Athlon Silver 3050e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon Silver 3050e vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon Silver 3050e
The Athlon Silver 3050e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,979 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Athlon Silver 3050e packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon Silver 3050e versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 42.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 1.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon Silver 3050e uses the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon Silver 3050e scores 2,979 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 125.6% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 1,175 vs 8,191 (149.8% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 758 vs 1,454, a 62.9% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,494 vs 5,783 (117.9% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 4 MB on the Athlon Silver 3050e vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.3 GHz+54% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz+107% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 256K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Dali (Zen) (2020) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,979 | 13,029+337% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,175 | 8,191+597% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 758 | 1,454+92% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,494 | 5,783+287% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon Silver 3050e uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Athlon Silver 3050e versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon Silver 3050e) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Dalí (Athlon Silver 3050e) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400 | DDR4-2666+11% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon Silver 3050e) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Athlon Silver 3050e includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 3 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon Silver 3050e was priced at $100, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($100 vs $160), Athlon Silver 3050e was $60 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon Silver 3050e delivers 29.8 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 92.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon Silver 3050e | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-38% | $160 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.8 | 81.4+173% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















