Atom C3508
VS
Ryzen 9 5900X

Atom C3508 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

Intel

Atom C3508

4 Cores4 Thrd11.25 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 5900X

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Atom C3508 is positioned at rank #409 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3508

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5675%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
95%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1072%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
952%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
735%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
98%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
98%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
97%
#278
Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP: $1445|Avg: N/A
96%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $1130
95%
#409
Atom C3508
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#416
Xeon E3-1276 v3
MSRP: $213|Avg: $244
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 5900X

#141
Core i9-13900K
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
105%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
104%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
103%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
103%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
103%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
103%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
102%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
102%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
102%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
101%
#151
Core Ultra 7 265T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $362
101%
#152
Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $85|Avg: $64
101%
#153
Core i3-9100T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
101%
#154
Ryzen 5 4600G
MSRP: $154|Avg: $143
100%
#155
Core i7-13700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
100%
#156
Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $350
100%
#157
Core i7-13700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $345
100%
#158
Core i5-13600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
99%
#159
Ryzen 5 3400GE
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
99%
#160
Core i7-12700F
MSRP: $314|Avg: $275
99%
#161
Core i5-9400
MSRP: $192|Avg: $85
99%
#162
Core i3-13100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $128
99%
#163
Core i9-10910
MSRP: $488|Avg: $200
96%
#164
Core i5-14600T
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
96%
#165
Core i5-11500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $120
95%
#166
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#167
Ryzen 3 8300GE
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
95%
#168
Core i3-13100T
MSRP: $134|Avg: $122
94%
#169
Core i5-10600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $110
94%
#170
Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $100|Avg: $67
94%
#171
Core Ultra 9 285
MSRP: $589|Avg: $550
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Ryzen 9 5900X delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom C3508 in both compute-intensive tasks (182% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAtom C3508Ryzen 9 5900X
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom C3508Ryzen 9 5900X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($350)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3508 and Ryzen 9 5900X

Intel

Atom C3508

The Atom C3508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Processing Power

The Atom C3508 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Atom C3508 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 100% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Atom C3508 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3508 scores 1,831 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 182% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Atom C3508 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

FeatureAtom C3508Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
12 / 24+200%
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
4.8 GHz+200%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.7 GHz+131%
L3 Cache
8 MB
64 MB+700%
L2 Cache
8 MB+1500%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark
1,831
38,955+2028%
Cinebench R23 Multi
21,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,888
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3508 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-1866 memory speed. The Atom C3508 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3508) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3508) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

FeatureAtom C3508Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket
FCBGA1310
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+100%
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
24+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3508) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

FeatureAtom C3508Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Workstation