Atom C3708
VS
Athlon X4 845

Atom C3708 vs Athlon X4 845

Intel

Atom C3708

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Athlon X4 845

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3708 is positioned at rank 615 and the Athlon X4 845 is on rank 393, so the Athlon X4 845 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3708

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9977%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1884%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1674%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1293%
#366
Xeon Silver 4216
MSRP: $1011|Avg: $800
100%
#367
EPYC 9454P
MSRP: $4598|Avg: $3333
99%
#369
Xeon Gold 6542Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
96%
#370
EPYC 7502
MSRP: $2600|Avg: $1299
96%
#371
Xeon 6730P
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
95%
#372
Xeon Gold 6330
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $2128
95%
#373
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
95%
#374
Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP: $3658|Avg: N/A
94%
#375
Xeon D-2766NT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $212
94%
#376
Xeon Gold 6442Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
94%
#615
Atom C3708
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#618
Xeon W-2133
MSRP: $617|Avg: $617
98%
#622
Xeon E5607
MSRP: $135|Avg: $27
96%
#626
Xeon Silver 4209T
MSRP: $563|Avg: $649
94%
#627
Xeon E3-1240
MSRP: $273|Avg: $39
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 845

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5791%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5472%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3973%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1197%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
948%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
829%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
475%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
469%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
427%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
427%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
422%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
411%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
405%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
403%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
400%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
97%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
100%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
98%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
98%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
97%
#393
Athlon X4 845
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
100%
#395
Celeron G3930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $25
100%
#396
Ryzen 3 1300X
MSRP: $129|Avg: $54
100%
#400
Phenom II X3 710
MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
99%
#403
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3708 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3708Athlon X4 845
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon X4 845 (2016) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3708Athlon X4 845
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3708 and Athlon X4 845

Intel

Atom C3708

The Atom C3708 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,750 points. Launch price was $209.

AMD

Athlon X4 845

The Athlon X4 845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,768 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Atom C3708 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Athlon X4 845 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3708 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Atom C3708 versus 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 845 — a 76.4% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 845 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Atom C3708 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon X4 845 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3708 scores 3,750 against the Athlon X4 845's 3,768 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon X4 845.

FeatureAtom C3708Athlon X4 845
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
3.8 GHz+124%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
3.5 GHz+106%
L3 Cache
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB+700%
2 MB
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark
3,750
3,768
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3708 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X4 845 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3708 versus DDR3-2133 on the Athlon X4 845 — the Atom C3708 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3708 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Atom C3708) vs 8 (Athlon X4 845) — the Atom C3708 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3708) and AMD FM2+ (Athlon X4 845).

FeatureAtom C3708Athlon X4 845
Socket
FCBGA1310
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+300%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+100%
8