Atom E3825
VS
Atom E3826

Atom E3825 vs Atom E3826

Intel

Atom E3825

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Atom E3826

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 1.47 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom E3825 is positioned at rank 626 and the Atom E3826 is on rank 922, so the Atom E3825 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E3825

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
97%
#613
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
838%
#614
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
826%
#615
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
758%
#616
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
755%
#617
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
748%
#619
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
722%
#620
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
693%
#621
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
691%
#622
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
673%
#626
Atom E3825
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#627
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#637
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E3826

#910
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1615%
#911
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1591%
#912
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1461%
#913
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1454%
#914
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1441%
#916
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1391%
#917
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1334%
#918
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1332%
#919
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1296%
#922
Atom E3826
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#923
Athlon II N370
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#928
A8-6410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
98%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Atom E3826 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom E3825 in both compute-intensive tasks (3.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAtom E3825Atom E3826
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-I (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-I (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom E3825Atom E3826
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom E3825 and Atom E3826

Intel

Atom E3825

The Atom E3825 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $73.

Intel

Atom E3826

The Atom E3826 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 545 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Atom E3825 and Atom E3826 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Atom E3825 versus 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3826 — a 10% clock advantage for the Atom E3826. Both are built on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Atom E3825 scores 525 against the Atom E3826's 545 — a 3.7% lead for the Atom E3826. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom E3825Atom E3826
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.33 GHz
1.47 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-I (2013)
Bay Trail-I (2013)
PassMark
525
545+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3L-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Atom E3825) vs 2 (Atom E3826). Both provide 4 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom E3825) and Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom E3826).

FeatureAtom E3825Atom E3826
Socket
FCBGA1170
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1066
DDR3L-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom E3825) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom E3826) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom E3825Atom E3826
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)