Atom E3825 vs Sempron 145

Atom E3825 vs Sempron 145 Performance Spectrum

Atom E3825

2 / 2

525

0.0%

544

+3.6%

Athlon XP 2200+

Athlon XP 2700+

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Athlon 64 3100+

Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom E3825 vs Sempron 145 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom E3825 vs Sempron 145: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom E3825

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 45W, a 39W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Sempron 145 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Sempron 145 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (525 vs 544).

Sempron 145

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌650% higher power demand at 45W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom E3825 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 145 better than Atom E3825?

Yes. Sempron 145 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron 145 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 145 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 145 still makes the most sense overall. Sempron 145 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom E3825 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom E3825 vs Sempron 145 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E3825

The Atom E3825 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $73.

Sempron 145

The Sempron 145 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 544 points. Launch price was $95.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom E3825 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Sempron 145 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom E3825 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Atom E3825 versus 2.8 GHz on the Sempron 145 — a 71.2% clock advantage for the Sempron 145. The Atom E3825 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Sempron 145 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3825 scores 525 against the Sempron 145's 544 — a 3.6% lead for the Sempron 145. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom E3825	Sempron 145
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz	2.8 GHz+111%
Base Clock	—	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-I (2013)	Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark	525	544+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3825 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 145 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.