Atom E3825
VS
Sempron 140

Atom E3825 vs Sempron 140

Intel

Atom E3825

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Sempron 140

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom E3825 is positioned at rank 626 and the Sempron 140 is on rank 864, so the Atom E3825 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E3825

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
97%
#613
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
838%
#614
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
826%
#615
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
758%
#616
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
755%
#617
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
748%
#619
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
722%
#620
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
693%
#621
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
691%
#622
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
673%
#626
Atom E3825
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#627
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#637
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 140

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18229%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17225%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12506%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3768%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2984%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2611%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1495%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1476%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1344%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1344%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1329%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1293%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1275%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1270%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1258%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
96%
#864
Sempron 140
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
100%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
99%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
99%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
99%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
97%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
97%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
97%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
97%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
96%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
96%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
96%
#877
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
95%
#878
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
95%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Sempron 140 leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom E3825 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom E3825Sempron 140
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-I (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sargas (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom E3825Sempron 140
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom E3825 and Sempron 140

Intel

Atom E3825

The Atom E3825 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $73.

AMD

Sempron 140

The Sempron 140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 513 points. Launch price was $40.

Processing Power

The Atom E3825 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Sempron 140 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom E3825 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Atom E3825 versus 2.7 GHz on the Sempron 140 — a 68% clock advantage for the Sempron 140. The Atom E3825 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Sempron 140 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3825 scores 525 against the Sempron 140's 513 — a 2.3% lead for the Atom E3825. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom E3825Sempron 140
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.33 GHz
2.7 GHz+103%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-I (2013)
Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark
525+2%
513
Geekbench 6 Single
292
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3825 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 140 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1066 memory speed. Memory channels: 1 (Atom E3825) vs 2 (Sempron 140). Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom E3825) and AM3,AM2+ (Sempron 140).

FeatureAtom E3825Sempron 140
Socket
FCBGA1170
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1066
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom E3825) / AMD-V (Sempron 140). The Atom E3825 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Sempron 140 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Sempron 140 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Sempron 140 rivals Celeron 420.

FeatureAtom E3825Sempron 140
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget