Atom E3825 vs Sempron 3800+

Atom E3825 vs Sempron 3800+ Performance Spectrum

Atom E3825

2 / 2

525

0.0%

528

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom E3825 vs Sempron 3800+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom E3825 vs Sempron 3800+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom E3825

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 62W, a 56W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Sempron 3800+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (525 vs 528).

Sempron 3800+

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌933.3% higher power demand at 62W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom E3825 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron 3800+ better than Atom E3825?

Yes. Sempron 3800+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron 3800+ has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 65.4% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron 3800+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron 3800+ still makes the most sense overall. Sempron 3800+ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% higher PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom E3825 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom E3825 vs Sempron 3800+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E3825

The Atom E3825 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $73.

Sempron 3800+

The Sempron 3800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 528 points. Launch price was $21.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom E3825 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Sempron 3800+ offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom E3825 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Atom E3825 versus 2.2 GHz on the Sempron 3800+ — a 49.3% clock advantage for the Sempron 3800+. The Atom E3825 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Sempron 3800+ uses Manila (2001−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3825 scores 525 against the Sempron 3800+'s 528 — a 0.6% lead for the Sempron 3800+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom E3825	Sempron 3800+
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz	2.2 GHz+65%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)+100%	256 kB
Process	22 nm-76%	90 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-I (2013)	Manila (2001−2006)
PassMark	525	528

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3825 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3800+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.