Atom E3825 vs Turion 64 MT-32

Atom E3825

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2013

Turion 64 MT-32

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.79 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Atom E3825

2 / 2

525

+4.0%

505

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom E3825 is positioned at rank 626 and the Turion 64 MT-32 is on rank 942, so the Atom E3825 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E3825

#187

Core Ultra 9 288V

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

97%

#613

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

838%

#614

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

826%

#615

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

758%

#616

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

755%

#617

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

748%

#619

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

722%

#620

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

693%

#621

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

691%

#622

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

673%

#626

Atom E3825

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#627

Core i5-1335UE

MSRP: $312|Avg: $312

100%

#637

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

MSRP: $80|Avg: $10

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 MT-32

#930

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1743%

#931

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1718%

#932

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1577%

#933

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1570%

#934

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1555%

#936

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1502%

#937

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1440%

#938

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1438%

#939

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1399%

#942

Turion 64 MT-32

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#944

Athlon Neo X2 L335

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

99%

#945

Core i7-3610QE

MSRP: $315|Avg: $105

99%

#948

A8-8600P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

98%

#949

FX-9800P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

97%

#951

Celeron 1020E

MSRP: $86|Avg: $20

97%

#954

Core i7-5850EQ

MSRP: $435|Avg: $370

96%

#956

Core i7-4810MQ

MSRP: $378|Avg: $378

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom E3825 (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Atom E3825	Turion 64 MT-32
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-I (2013) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion 64 MT-32 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Atom E3825	Turion 64 MT-32
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Atom E3825 Benchmark Check

Turion 64 MT-32 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom E3825 and Turion 64 MT-32

Atom E3825

The Atom E3825 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $73.

Turion 64 MT-32

The Turion 64 MT-32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.79 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom E3825 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 MT-32 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom E3825 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Atom E3825 versus 1.79 GHz on the Turion 64 MT-32 — a 29.5% clock advantage for the Turion 64 MT-32. The Atom E3825 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 MT-32 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3825 scores 525 against the Turion 64 MT-32's 505 — a 3.9% lead for the Atom E3825. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom E3825	Turion 64 MT-32
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz	1.79 GHz+35%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB
Process	22 nm-76%	90 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-I (2013)	Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark	525+4%	505

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom E3825 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 MT-32 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.