
Atom N2800

Ryzen 5 3600
Atom N2800 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom N2800 vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom N2800 vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom N2800
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $152 less on MSRP ($47 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3650, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,829 vs 17,685).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.9 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($47 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +364.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 128.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 38.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $47 MSRP).
- ✅500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom N2800.
Trade-offs
- ❌323.4% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$47 MSRP
- ❌828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N2800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Atom N2800?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom N2800 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N2800
The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Atom N2800 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 76.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Atom N2800 uses the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N2800 scores 1,829 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 162.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom N2800 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 1.87 GHz | 4.2 GHz+125% |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz | 3.6 GHz+94% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 1,829 | 17,685+867% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom N2800 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom N2800 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N2800) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom N2800) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N2800) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR4-3200+200% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 24+500% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom N2800) / Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Atom N2800 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3650 | — |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Atom N2800 was priced at $47, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($47 vs $199), Atom N2800 was $152 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom N2800 delivers 38.9 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 78.2% better value option.
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $47-76% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.9 | 88.9+129% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














