
Atom x5-E8000

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Atom x5-E8000 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x5-E8000 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x5-E8000 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x5-E8000
2016Why buy it
- β Costs $431 less on MSRP ($18 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- β Delivers 134.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 178.8 vs 76.4 PassMark/$ ($18 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- β Draws 5W instead of 120W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (3,219 vs 34,293).
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +306.1% higher average FPS across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 600% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 76.4 vs 178.8 PassMark/$ ($449 MSRP vs $18 MSRP).
- β2300% higher power demand at 120W vs 5W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Atom x5-E8000?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x5-E8000 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-E8000
The Atom x5-E8000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015β2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.04 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,219 points. Launch price was $39.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Atom x5-E8000 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.04 GHz on the Atom x5-E8000 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D β a 131.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. The Atom x5-E8000 uses the Cherry Trail (2015β2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-E8000 scores 3,219 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 β a 165.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-E8000 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | Atom x5-E8000 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.04 GHz | 5 GHz+381% |
| Base Clock | β | 4.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Cherry Trail (2015β2016) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 3,219 | 34,293+965% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Atom x5-E8000 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D β the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports 225% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom x5-E8000) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) β the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom x5-E8000) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | Atom x5-E8000 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | β | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | DDR5-5200+225% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 28+600% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x5-E8000) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Both include integrated graphics β Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (Atom x5-E8000) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Atom x5-E8000 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Atom x5-E8000 was priced at $18, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D came in at $449. On launch pricing ($18 vs $449), Atom x5-E8000 was $431 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom x5-E8000 delivers 178.8 pts/$ vs 76.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D β making the Atom x5-E8000 the 80.3% better value option.
| Feature | Atom x5-E8000 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $18-96% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 178.8+134% | 76.4 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














