
Atom x7-E3950

Ryzen 7 3700X
Atom x7-E3950 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7-E3950 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7-E3950 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7-E3950
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 12W instead of 65W, a 53W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 505, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,864 vs 22,430).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +447.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Atom x7-E3950 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌441.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 12W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7-E3950 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Atom x7-E3950?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7-E3950 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7-E3950
The Atom x7-E3950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,864 points. Launch price was $57.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Atom x7-E3950 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom x7-E3950 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 75% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Atom x7-E3950 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7-E3950 scores 1,864 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 169.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x7-E3950 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Atom x7-E3950 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+120% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz+125% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 1,864 | 22,430+1103% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 245 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7-E3950 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-2400 on the Atom x7-E3950 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Atom x7-E3950) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 6 (Atom x7-E3950) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 18 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apollo Lake (Atom x7-E3950) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Atom x7-E3950 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1296 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-2400 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 6 | 24+300% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7-E3950) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Atom x7-E3950 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 505), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom x7-E3950 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 505 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













