Atom x7425E vs Xeon X5687

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7425E vs Xeon X5687 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7425E vs Xeon X5687: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7425E

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 12W instead of 130W, a 118W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1366 and older memory support.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (24EU), while Xeon X5687 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5687 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5687, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 36 PCIe lanes.

Xeon X5687

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 36 PCIe lanes vs 9.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (5,386 vs 5,427).
❌Launch MSRP is still $552 MSRP, while Atom x7425E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 12W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1366, while Atom x7425E moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7425E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7425E better than Xeon X5687?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5687 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Atom x7425E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7425E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7425E is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon X5687 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Atom x7425E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $552 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X5687 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 19.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon X5687 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7425E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2011), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA1366, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7425E vs Xeon X5687 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7425E

The Atom x7425E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Gracemont (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon X5687

The Xeon X5687 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,386 points. Launch price was $121.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7425E packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5687's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7425E versus 3.86 GHz on the Xeon X5687 — a 12.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X5687 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Atom x7425E uses the Gracemont (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon X5687 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7425E scores 5,427 against the Xeon X5687's 5,386 — a 0.8% lead for the Atom x7425E. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7425E vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5687.

Feature	Atom x7425E	Xeon X5687
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.86 GHz+14%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	3.6 GHz+140%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Gracemont (2023)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	5,427	5,386
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,643
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,386

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7425E uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon X5687 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7425E versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5687 — the Atom x7425E supports 260.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon X5687 supports up to 288 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 1700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7425E) vs 3 (Xeon X5687). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7425E) vs 36 (Xeon X5687) — the Xeon X5687 offers 27 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7425E) and X58 (Xeon X5687).

Feature	Atom x7425E	Xeon X5687
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+260%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	288 GB+1700%
RAM Channels	1	3+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	9	36+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7425E) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5687). The Atom x7425E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (24EU)), while the Xeon X5687 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5687 targets Server.