Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 9 5900X

CPU

GPU

Atom x7835RE

8 Cores8 Thrd12 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 9 5900X

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum

Atom x7835RE

8 / 8

6,795

0.0%

38,955

+473.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7835RE

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $422 less on MSRP ($127 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Draws 12W instead of 105W, a 93W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (32EU), while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,795 vs 38,955).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($127 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +134.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+966.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Delivers 32.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 53.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $127 MSRP).
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
332.3% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$127 MSRP
❌775% higher power demand at 105W vs 12W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Atom x7835RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7835RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Atom x7835RE?

Yes. Ryzen 9 5900X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 134.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 473.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 134.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900X is the stronger fit. You are getting 473.3% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 9 5900X comes in 332.3% more expensive on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $127 MSRP, and it still gives you a 134.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 32.6% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 53.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7835RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7835RE vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7835RE

The Atom x7835RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 6,795 points. Launch price was $127.

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7835RE packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7835RE versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Atom x7835RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7835RE scores 6,795 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 140.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7835RE vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4.8 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.7 GHz+185%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	64 MB+967%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	10 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-30%
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	6,795	38,955+473%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	21,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,888

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7835RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7835RE versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Atom x7835RE supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7835RE) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7835RE) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 15 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7835RE) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket	FCBGA1264	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+50%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	128 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	9	24+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7835RE) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Atom x7835RE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)	—
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom x7835RE was priced at $127, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($127 vs $549), Atom x7835RE was $422 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom x7835RE delivers 53.5 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 28% better value option.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP	$127-77%	$549
Performance per Dollar	53.5	71.0+33%
Release Date	2024	2020

Search Atom x7835RE on Amazon

Search Ryzen 9 5900X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.