Atom Z3735G
VS
Athlon II X4 620e

Atom Z3735G vs Athlon II X4 620e

Intel

Atom Z3735G

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.83 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Athlon II X4 620e

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom Z3735G is positioned at rank 5 and the Athlon II X4 620e is on rank 605, so the Atom Z3735G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z3735G

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
101%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
100%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
92%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
91%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
91%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
87%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
84%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
84%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
81%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
75%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
74%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 620e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10621%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10035%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7287%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2195%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1739%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1521%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
871%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
860%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
783%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
783%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
774%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
753%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
743%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
740%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
733%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
99%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
98%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
97%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
100%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
100%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
99%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
99%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
98%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
97%
#615
Core i3-4130
MSRP: $117|Avg: $55
97%
#617
Pentium G3250T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $30
97%
#619
Core i5-7640X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $85
97%
#620
Athlon II X3 425e
MSRP: $79|Avg: $58
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon II X4 620e delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom Z3735G in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAtom Z3735GAthlon II X4 620e
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($17)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Atom Z3735G holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $17 (vs $40), it costs 57% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 134% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Athlon II X4 620e.
InsightAtom Z3735GAthlon II X4 620e
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+134%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($17)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom Z3735G and Athlon II X4 620e

Intel

Atom Z3735G

The Atom Z3735G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,891 points. Launch price was $17.

AMD

Athlon II X4 620e

The Athlon II X4 620e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Atom Z3735G and Athlon II X4 620e share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom Z3735G versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 620e — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 620e (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Atom Z3735G uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon II X4 620e uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3735G scores 2,891 against the Athlon II X4 620e's 2,906 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II X4 620e. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Atom Z3735G vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 620e.

FeatureAtom Z3735GAthlon II X4 620e
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.83 GHz
2.6 GHz+42%
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
2.6 GHz+95%
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,891
2,906
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3735G uses the UTFCBGA592 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X4 620e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-RS 1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X4 620e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 1 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom Z3735G) vs 2 (Athlon II X4 620e). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom Z3735G) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X4 620e).

FeatureAtom Z3735GAthlon II X4 620e
Socket
UTFCBGA592
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-RS 1333
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
1 GB
32 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom Z3735G includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Athlon II X4 620e requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom Z3735GAthlon II X4 620e
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
💰

Value Analysis

The Atom Z3735G launched at $17 MSRP, while the Athlon II X4 620e debuted at $99.

FeatureAtom Z3735GAthlon II X4 620e
MSRP
$17-83%
$99
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Release Date
2014
2011