Celeron 1017U
VS
A6-6400K

Celeron 1017U vs A6-6400K

Intel

Celeron 1017U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A6-6400K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1017U is positioned at rank 975 and the A6-6400K is on rank 688, so the A6-6400K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1017U

#963
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1946%
#964
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1917%
#965
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1760%
#966
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1752%
#967
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1736%
#969
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1676%
#970
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1607%
#971
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1605%
#972
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1562%
#975
Celeron 1017U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#977
Phenom II X2 N640
MSRP: $100|Avg: $55
100%
#978
A10-8700P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
100%
#982
Athlon II Neo K125
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#986
Pro A8-8600B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-6400K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12379%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11697%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8493%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2559%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2027%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1773%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1015%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1002%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
913%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
912%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
902%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
878%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
866%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
862%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
854%
#688
A6-6400K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
99%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
98%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#692
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
98%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
98%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
98%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
98%
#696
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
97%
#697
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
97%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
97%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
97%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
97%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
96%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A6-6400K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 1017U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 1017UA6-6400K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 1017UA6-6400K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1017U and A6-6400K

Intel

Celeron 1017U

The Celeron 1017U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,508 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A6-6400K

The A6-6400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,511 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1017U and A6-6400K share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 1017U versus 4.1 GHz on the A6-6400K — a 87.7% clock advantage for the A6-6400K (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Celeron 1017U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the A6-6400K uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1017U scores 1,508 against the A6-6400K's 1,511 — a 0.2% lead for the A6-6400K. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1017U vs 0 kB on the A6-6400K.

FeatureCeleron 1017UA6-6400K
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
4.1 GHz+156%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.9 GHz+144%
L3 Cache
2 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1024 kB+100%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,508
1,511
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1017U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A6-6400K uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1017U versus 1866 on the A6-6400K — the A6-6400K supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1023 (Celeron 1017U) and FM2 (A6-6400K).

FeatureCeleron 1017UA6-6400K
Socket
BGA1023
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
1866+62100%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+104857500%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron 1017U) / true (A6-6400K). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1017U) and Radeon HD 8470D (A6-6400K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-6400K rivals Pentium G3258.

FeatureCeleron 1017UA6-6400K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Radeon HD 8470D
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true