Celeron 1019Y vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1019Y vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1019Y vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1019Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium Dual-Core E2200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (985 vs 1,005).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Celeron 1019Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1019Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Dual-Core E2200 better than Celeron 1019Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1019Y pulls ahead with 2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1019Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is the better buy right now. Pentium Dual-Core E2200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $100 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron 1019Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1019Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1019Y vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1019Y

The Celeron 1019Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $153.

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

The Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 985 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1019Y and Pentium Dual-Core E2200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the Celeron 1019Y versus 2.2 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 — a 75% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual-Core E2200. The Celeron 1019Y uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1019Y scores 1,005 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2200's 985 — a 2% lead for the Celeron 1019Y. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1019Y vs 0 kB on the Pentium Dual-Core E2200.

Feature	Celeron 1019Y	Pentium Dual-Core E2200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1 GHz	2.2 GHz+120%
Base Clock	1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB (total)+100%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,005+2%	985

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1019Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1019Y versus DDR2-800 on the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 — the Celeron 1019Y supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1019Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1019Y) vs 0 (Pentium Dual-Core E2200) — the Celeron 1019Y offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron 1019Y	Pentium Dual-Core E2200
Socket	BGA1023	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+100%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+700%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron 1019Y includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1019Y targets Budget, Pentium Dual-Core E2200 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 1019Y rivals Pentium 2117U.