Celeron 3865U
VS
A6-9225

Celeron 3865U vs A6-9225

Intel

Celeron 3865U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2017
VS
AMD

A6-9225

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3865U is positioned at rank 645 and the A6-9225 is on rank 830, so the Celeron 3865U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3865U

#633
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
874%
#634
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
861%
#635
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
790%
#636
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
787%
#637
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
780%
#639
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
753%
#640
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
722%
#641
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
721%
#642
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
701%
#645
Celeron 3865U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9225

#818
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1320%
#819
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1300%
#820
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1194%
#821
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1188%
#822
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1178%
#824
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1137%
#825
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1090%
#826
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1089%
#827
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1059%
#830
A6-9225
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#835
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#837
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-9225 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 3865U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 3865UA6-9225
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-U (2017) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 3865UA6-9225
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3865U and A6-9225

Intel

Celeron 3865U

The Celeron 3865U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,343 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

A6-9225

The A6-9225 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,334 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3865U and A6-9225 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 3865U versus 3.1 GHz on the A6-9225 — a 53.1% clock advantage for the A6-9225 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron 3865U uses the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the A6-9225 uses Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3865U scores 1,343 against the A6-9225's 1,334 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 3865U.

FeatureCeleron 3865UA6-9225
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz+72%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.6 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake-U (2017)
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
1,343
1,334
Geekbench 6 Single
389
Geekbench 6 Multi
674
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3865U uses the BGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A6-9225 uses BGA (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866 memory speed. The Celeron 3865U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 3865U) vs 1 (A6-9225). PCIe lanes: 10 (Celeron 3865U) vs 8 (A6-9225) — the Celeron 3865U offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 100-series,200-series (Celeron 3865U) and AMD BGA soldered (A6-9225).

FeatureCeleron 3865UA6-9225
Socket
BGA1356
BGA
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133 / LPDDR3-1866
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10+25%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Celeron 3865U) / not specified (A6-9225). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 610 (Celeron 3865U) and AMD Radeon R4 (A6-9225) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3865U targets Entry-level. Direct competitor: Celeron 3865U rivals Pentium Gold 4415U.

FeatureCeleron 3865UA6-9225
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 610
AMD Radeon R4
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Entry-level