
Celeron 4305U

Ryzen 5 3600
Celeron 4305U vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 4305U vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 4305U vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 4305U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $92 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 610, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,562 vs 17,685).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +446.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Delivers 508.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron 4305U.
Trade-offs
- ❌86% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$107 MSRP
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 4305U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Celeron 4305U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 4305U vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 4305U
The Celeron 4305U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,562 points. Launch price was $107.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Celeron 4305U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 4305U versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 62.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron 4305U uses the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 4305U scores 1,562 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 167.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 4305U vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Celeron 4305U | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+91% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+64% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 1,562 | 17,685+1032% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 4305U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the Celeron 4305U versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 4305U) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Whiskey Lake-U (Celeron 4305U) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Celeron 4305U | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1528 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2133 | DDR4-3200+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Celeron 4305U) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Celeron 4305U includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 610), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4305U targets Budget, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron 4305U rivals Pentium Gold 5405U; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Celeron 4305U | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | Yes |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 4305U was priced at $107, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($107 vs $199), Celeron 4305U was $92 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 4305U delivers 14.6 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 143.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 4305U | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-46% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.6 | 88.9+509% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














