Celeron 560 vs Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Celeron 560

31 WW2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019
Ryzen family
·······

Celeron 560 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 560 vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 560 vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 560

2008

Why buy it

  • Costs $110 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Draws 31W instead of 65W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (475 vs 17,685).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +1588.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +3100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1 MB).
  • Delivers 1565.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 5.3 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron 560.

Trade-offs

  • 123.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
  • 109.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 31W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Celeron 560?
Yes. Ryzen 5 3600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1588.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3623.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1588.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3623.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 3100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3600 comes in 123.6% more expensive on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $89 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1588.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1565.1% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 5.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2008) and 3100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 560 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron 560

The Celeron 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 3600 is built on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 560 scores 475 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 189.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 560 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCeleron 560Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.13 GHz
3.6 GHz+69%
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
32 MB (total)+3100%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
65 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-89%
Architecture
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
475
17,685+3623%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 560 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 560 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 379.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron 560) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Santa Rosa (Celeron 560) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

FeatureCeleron 560Ryzen 5 3600
Socket
PGA478
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR4-3200+380%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
128 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
0
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 560) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Celeron 560 targets Budget, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron 560 rivals Pentium T2310; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureCeleron 560Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
No
Yes
Target Use
Budget
Gaming/Budget Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 560 was priced at $89, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($89 vs $199), Celeron 560 was $110 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 560 delivers 5.3 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 177.3% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 560Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP
$89-55%
$199
Performance per Dollar
5.3
88.9+1577%
Release Date
2008
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.