Celeron 560 vs Ryzen 9 5900X

CPU

GPU

Celeron 560

31 WW2008

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 9 5900X

12 Cores24 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 560 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Performance Spectrum

Celeron 560

475

0.0%

38,955

+8101.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 560 vs Ryzen 9 5900X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 560 vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 560

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $460 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Draws 31W instead of 105W, a 74W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (475 vs 38,955).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +2198.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+6300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Delivers 1229.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 5.3 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
516.9% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$89 MSRP
❌238.7% higher power demand at 105W vs 31W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Celeron 560?

Yes. Ryzen 9 5900X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2198.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 8101.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 5900X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2198.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 5900X is the stronger fit. You are getting 8101.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 6300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 9 5900X comes in 516.9% more expensive on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $89 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2198.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1229.5% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 5.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 5900X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2008) and 6300% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 1 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 560 vs Ryzen 9 5900X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 560

The Celeron 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5900X is built on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 560 scores 475 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 195.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900X. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 560 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.

Feature	Celeron 560	Ryzen 9 5900X
Cores / Threads	—	12 / 24
Boost Clock	—	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	3.7 GHz+74%
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	64 MB+6300%
L2 Cache	—	512K (per core)
Process	65 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-89%
Architecture	—	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	475	38,955+8101%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	21,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,174
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,888

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 560 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 560 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Ryzen 9 5900X supports 379.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 5900X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron 560) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Santa Rosa (Celeron 560) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).

Feature	Celeron 560	Ryzen 9 5900X
Socket	PGA478	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR4-3200+380%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	128 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 560) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). Primary use case: Celeron 560 targets Budget, Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron 560 rivals Pentium T2310; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.

Feature	Celeron 560	Ryzen 9 5900X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	AMD-V
Target Use	Budget	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 560 was priced at $89, while the Ryzen 9 5900X came in at $549. On launch pricing ($89 vs $549), Celeron 560 was $460 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 560 delivers 5.3 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 172% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 560	Ryzen 9 5900X
MSRP	$89-84%	$549
Performance per Dollar	5.3	71.0+1240%
Release Date	2008	2020

Search Celeron 560 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 9 5900X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.