Celeron 877 vs E1-2200

Celeron 877 vs E1-2200 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 877

2 / 2

805

+0.4%

802

0.0%

Athlon XP 3200+

Athlon 64 3300+

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Athlon 64 FX-55

Ryzen 7 4700G

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 877 vs E1-2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 877 vs E1-2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 877

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while E1-2200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while E1-2200 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌88.9% higher power demand at 17W vs 9W.

E1-2200

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 17W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (802 vs 805).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 877 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 877 better than E1-2200?

Yes. Celeron 877 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 877 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 877 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 877 is the better buy right now. Celeron 877 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-2200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 877 vs E1-2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 877

The Celeron 877 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 805 points. Launch price was $86.

E1-2200

The E1-2200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.05 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 802 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 877 and E1-2200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 877 versus 1.05 GHz on the E1-2200 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron 877. The Celeron 877 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the E1-2200 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 877 scores 805 against the E1-2200's 802 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 877.

Feature	Celeron 877	E1-2200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz+33%	1.05 GHz
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1024 kB+300%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	805	802

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 877 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E1-2200 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 877	E1-2200
Socket	BGA1023	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 877) / not specified (E1-2200). The Celeron 877 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the E1-2200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 877 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 877 rivals Pentium 967.