PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 877 vs Pentium U5600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 877 vs Pentium U5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 877

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 18W, a 1W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium U5600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium U5600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (805 vs 835).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Pentium U5600

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 9.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 877 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium U5600 better than Celeron 877?

Yes. Pentium U5600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium U5600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium U5600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium U5600 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Pentium U5600 comes in 16.3% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 877 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 4.9% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 877 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 877 vs Pentium U5600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 877

The Celeron 877 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 805 points. Launch price was $86.

Pentium U5600

The Pentium U5600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 835 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 877 and Pentium U5600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 877 versus 1.33 GHz on the Pentium U5600 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Celeron 877 (base: 1.4 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The Celeron 877 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium U5600 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 877 scores 805 against the Pentium U5600's 835 — a 3.7% lead for the Pentium U5600. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 877 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium U5600.

Feature	Celeron 877	Pentium U5600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz+5%	1.33 GHz
Base Clock	1.4 GHz+5%	1.33 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	805	835+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 877 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium U5600 uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 877	Pentium U5600
Socket	BGA1023	BGA1288
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 877) / not specified (Pentium U5600). The Celeron 877 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium U5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 877 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 877 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron 877	Pentium U5600
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 877 was priced at $86, while the Pentium U5600 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($86 vs $100), Celeron 877 was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 877 delivers 9.4 pts/$ vs 8.3 pts/$ for the Pentium U5600 — making the Celeron 877 the 11.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 877	Pentium U5600
MSRP	$86-14%	$100
Performance per Dollar	9.4+13%	8.3
Release Date	2012	2011

Search Celeron 877 on Amazon

Search Pentium U5600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.