
Celeron 877

Pentium Dual-Core E2140
Celeron 877 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2140 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 877 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2140 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 877 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 877
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium Dual-Core E2140 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (805 vs 815).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 11.0 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $74 MSRP).
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
2007Why buy it
- ✅Costs $12 less on MSRP ($74 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 9.4 PassMark/$ ($74 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 877 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium Dual-Core E2140 better than Celeron 877?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 877 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2140 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 877
The Celeron 877 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 805 points. Launch price was $86.

Pentium Dual-Core E2140
The Pentium Dual-Core E2140 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 815 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 877 and Pentium Dual-Core E2140 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 877 versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2140 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual-Core E2140. The Celeron 877 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2140 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 877 scores 805 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2140's 815 — a 1.2% lead for the Pentium Dual-Core E2140. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 877 vs 0 kB on the Pentium Dual-Core E2140.
| Feature | Celeron 877 | Pentium Dual-Core E2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 1.4 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+25500% | 1 MB (total) |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 805 | 815+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 877 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2140 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 877 | Pentium Dual-Core E2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 877) / not specified (Pentium Dual-Core E2140). The Celeron 877 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2140 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 877 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 877 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | Celeron 877 | Pentium Dual-Core E2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 877 was priced at $86, while the Pentium Dual-Core E2140 came in at $74. On launch pricing ($86 vs $74), Pentium Dual-Core E2140 was $12 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 877 delivers 9.4 pts/$ vs 11.0 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual-Core E2140 — making the Pentium Dual-Core E2140 the 16.2% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 877 | Pentium Dual-Core E2140 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86 | $74-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.4 | 11.0+17% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














