Celeron 877 vs Pentium T3400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 877 vs Pentium T3400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 877 vs Pentium T3400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 877

2012

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Costs $64 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 66.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 35W, a 18W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium T3400 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (805 vs 845).

Pentium T3400

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 9.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌105.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 877 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium T3400 better than Celeron 877?

Yes. Pentium T3400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium T3400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium T3400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium T3400 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Pentium T3400 comes in 74.4% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 877 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 6.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 877 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008) and 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 877 vs Pentium T3400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 877

The Celeron 877 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 805 points. Launch price was $86.

Pentium T3400

The Pentium T3400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 845 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 877 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 877 scores 805 against the Pentium T3400's 845 — a 4.8% lead for the Pentium T3400. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 877 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T3400.

Feature	Celeron 877	Pentium T3400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	2.16 GHz+54%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)+100%	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	—
PassMark	805	845+5%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 877 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T3400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 877	Pentium T3400
Socket	BGA1023	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 877) / not specified (Pentium T3400). The Celeron 877 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium T3400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 877 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 877 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron 877	Pentium T3400
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 877 was priced at $86, while the Pentium T3400 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($86 vs $150), Celeron 877 was $64 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 877 delivers 9.4 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Pentium T3400 — making the Celeron 877 the 49.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 877	Pentium T3400
MSRP	$86-43%	$150
Performance per Dollar	9.4+68%	5.6
Release Date	2012	2008

Search Celeron 877 on Amazon

Search Pentium T3400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.