PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 877 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 877 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 877

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium Dual-Core E2160 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium Dual-Core E2160 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (805 vs 875).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).

Pentium Dual-Core E2160

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.4 vs 9.4 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 877 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium Dual-Core E2160 better than Celeron 877?

Yes. Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 8.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is the stronger fit. You are getting 8.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is the better buy right now. Pentium Dual-Core E2160 comes in $2 cheaper on MSRP at $84 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 11.3% better value on MSRP (10.4 vs 9.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 877 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 877 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 877

The Celeron 877 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 805 points. Launch price was $86.

Pentium Dual-Core E2160

The Pentium Dual-Core E2160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 875 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 877 and Pentium Dual-Core E2160 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 877 versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 — a 25% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual-Core E2160. The Celeron 877 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 877 scores 805 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2160's 875 — a 8.3% lead for the Pentium Dual-Core E2160. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 877 vs 0 kB on the Pentium Dual-Core E2160.

Feature	Celeron 877	Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	1.8 GHz+29%
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB (total)
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	805	875+9%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 877 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 877	Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Socket	BGA1023	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 877) / not specified (Pentium Dual-Core E2160). The Celeron 877 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 877 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 877 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron 877	Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 877 was priced at $86, while the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($86 vs $84), Pentium Dual-Core E2160 was $2 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 877 delivers 9.4 pts/$ vs 10.4 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 — making the Pentium Dual-Core E2160 the 10.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 877	Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP	$86	$84-2%
Performance per Dollar	9.4	10.4+11%
Release Date	2012	2007

Search Celeron 877 on Amazon

Search Pentium Dual-Core E2160 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.