Celeron 877 vs Ryzen 7 5700X

CPU

GPU

Celeron 877

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2012

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 5700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2022

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron 877 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum

Celeron 877

2 / 2

805

0.0%

26,609

+3205.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 877 vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 877 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 877

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $213 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (805 vs 26,609).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.4 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +1124.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Delivers 850.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 9.4 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
247.7% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$86 MSRP
❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 877 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Celeron 877?

Yes. Ryzen 7 5700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1124.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3205.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1124.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 3205.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 5700X comes in 247.7% more expensive on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1124.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 850.7% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 9.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2012), 1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 877 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 877

The Celeron 877 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 805 points. Launch price was $86.

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 877 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 877 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 106.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Celeron 877 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 877 scores 805 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 188.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 877 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.

Feature	Celeron 877	Ryzen 7 5700X
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	8 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	1.4 GHz	4.6 GHz+229%
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	3.4 GHz+143%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+1500%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	32 nm	7 nm-78%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark	805	26,609+3205%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	14,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,116
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	9,715

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 877 uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 877 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the Ryzen 7 5700X supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 877) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,HM75,HM76,HM77 (Celeron 877) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).

Feature	Celeron 877	Ryzen 7 5700X
Socket	BGA1023	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR4-3200+140%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	128 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 877) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). The Celeron 877 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 877 targets Budget, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron 877 rivals Pentium 967; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.

Feature	Celeron 877	Ryzen 7 5700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	AMD-V
Target Use	Budget	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 877 was priced at $86, while the Ryzen 7 5700X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($86 vs $299), Celeron 877 was $213 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 877 delivers 9.4 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 161.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 877	Ryzen 7 5700X
MSRP	$86-71%	$299
Performance per Dollar	9.4	89.0+847%
Release Date	2012	2022

Search Celeron 877 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 5700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.